1 Who made God?
This is a deflection question as the origin of God has no affect on whether or not mankind and our Universe was created.
The Big Bang created space-time and thus the cause exists outside of space and time. 3-dimensional beings existing inside of time cannot comprehend any origin story of a consciousness outside of time. it is like attempting to picture a 9-dimensional object.
Saying the Universe has no cause or beginning (without proof or evidence) would not solve for the expansion of the universe or RNA or DNA sequence/code for first life/abiogenesis without citing another unproven hypothesis without evidence.
2 Which god/religion is true?
To get to a conclusion, one must study the origin, evidence, and theology of each religion. See the complete answer here: https://swordot.com/apologetics/are-other-religions-true/
3 Prove God is true?
All code in the universe has a coder. For example, Microsoft Windows has a programmer or morse code uses long and short beeps to code for letters. DNA codes for RNA and RNA codes for proteins serving as the blueprint/human genome. DNA or RNA sequence in first life/abiogenesis requires a coder as all code in the universe has a coder. Any hypothesis in attempt to explain RNA or DNA code in nature without a coder has been pure conjuncture/hypotheses without evidence or successful experimental data for decades (i.e. RNA world hypothesis).
The Big Bang created space-time and thus the cause exists outside of space and time. 3-dimensional beings existing inside of time cannot comprehend any origin story of a consciousness outside of time. it is like attempting to picture a 9-dimensional object.
Saying the Universe has no cause or beginning (without proof or evidence) would not solve for the expansion of the universe or RNA or DNA sequence/code for first life/abiogenesis without citing another unproven hypothesis without evidence.
Which god/religion is true?
To get to a conclusion, one must study the origin, evidence, and theology of each religion.
Citations on Genetic Code:
The universal triple-nucleotide genetic code, allowing DNA-encoded mRNA to be translated into the amino acid sequences of proteins using transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and many accessory and modification factors, is essentially common to all living organisms on Earth (J Bacteriol. 2019 Jul 10;201(15):e00091-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00091-19 Understanding the Genetic Code pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6620406/)
How does the cell convert DNA into working proteins? The process of translation can be seen as the decoding of instructions for making proteins, involving mRNA in transcription as well as tRNA. (Translation: DNA to mRNA to Protein nature.com/scitable/topicpage/translation-dna-to-mrna-to-protein-393/)
IS DNA CODE?
Scientifically and functionally, yes, DNA is coded.
In molecular biology, this is referred to as the genetic code—the set of rules by which information stored in DNA (and transcribed into mRNA) is translated by living cells into proteins.
How the Code Works Mechanically
The Alphabet: The DNA “alphabet” consists of four nucleotide bases: Adenine (A), Thymine (T), Cytosine (C), and Guanine (G). (In RNA, Uracil replaces Thymine).
The Words (Codons): These bases are read in groups of three, known as codons (e.g., AUG, GCA).
The Translation: Because there are four bases arranged in triplets (4^3), there are 64 possible combinations. These 64 codons map to specific amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) or serve as start/stop signals for protein synthesis.
The Philosophical Nuance: Code vs. Metaphor
While biologists use terms like code, translation, transcription, and reading universally, philosophers of science and semioticians often debate what kind of “code” DNA actually is:
The Functional/Information View: From an information theory and biochemical standpoint, DNA functions identically to a digital code: it is a linear sequence of stored data that carries instructions for building physical structures. It has a syntax, a reading frame, and error-checking mechanisms.
Do SpudCells prove abiogenesis?
SpudCell Deception: None of the highly complex components used in this experiment would spontaneously form on their own in a lifeless, natural environment (like primordial Earth).Here are the key components used in the experiment that required artificial engineering or harvesting:1. Ribosomes and Cellular MachinerySpudCells cannot produce their own ribosomes—the microscopic “factories” that read DNA and build proteins. To make the synthetic cell function, researchers had to manually harvest complex ribosomes and transfer RNA (tRNA) from living bacteria (like E. coli). In a purely natural, prebiotic world, these highly intricate biological machines do not exist on their own outside of living organisms.2. Hand-Picked, Pre-Evolved DNAThe genetic code used to operate the cell was not assembled from random chemical reactions. The scientists engineered a custom 90,000-base-pair genome by hand-picking 36 specific, highly evolved genes borrowed from an existing virus and E. coli. They arranged this code into seven separate DNA plasmids. Nature does not spontaneously write organized, functional genetic code of this length without the evolutionary process of pre-existing life.3. Pure ATP and Nutrient BrothsLiving things generate their own energy, but SpudCells are completely dependent on the scientists feeding them. They are bathed in an optimized, lab-created liquid soup filled with pure ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate)—the energy currency of life—as well as specialized sugars and lipids. In nature, ATP degrades quickly and does not naturally pool in the environment; it must be constantly manufactured by a living metabolism.4. Custom-Engineered Membrane ProteinsTo get the SpudCells to “eat” and eventually divide, they had to be fed by smaller “feeder bubbles” (liposomes) packed with enzymes. To make the SpudCell absorb these bubbles, researchers had to artificially tweak and insert a highly specific, modified protein into the cell’s membrane